death categorical syllogismness
a syllogism is an argument that takes two premises and deductively infers a conclusion.
a categorical proposition is a proposition that asserts or denies that some or all of the members of one category are included in another.
a categorical syllogism is a syllogism where the premises and conclusion are categorical propositions.
the first premise is called the major premise, and the second premise is called the minor premise.
each of the premises have one term in common with the conclusion.
in a major premise, this is the major term, and in a minor premise, this is the minor term.
each of the premises also have one term in common with each other, called the middle term.
the canonical example of a categorical syllogism is,
all men are mortal.
socrates is a man.
therefore, socrates is mortal.
here, ‘mortal’ is the major term, ‘socrates’ is the minor term, and ‘men’ is the middle term.
mortality salience is the awareness that one’s death is inevitable and undeferrable.
mortality salience develops during one’s childhood in three steps,
i
around two years of age, one understands the concept of the self, and gains self-awareness.
ii
between the ages of five and ten, one understands the concept of dying, which is made up of,
i
irreversibility
the understanding that death cannot be undone.
ii
non-functionality
the understanding that all biological functions cease upon death.
iii
universality
the understanding that all organisms eventually die.
iii
after understanding the concept of self and dying, one understands the concept of mortality by applying death to oneself as follows,
all organisms are mortal.
i am an organism.
therefore, i am mortal.
⠀
the above is a categorical syllogism.
‘mortal’ is the major term, ‘i’ is the minor term, and ‘organism’ is the middle term.
the conclusion corresponds to death anxiety, which is the anxiety caused by thoughts of one’s death.
the mechanism used to avoid death anxiety is denial.
in terms of the categorical syllogism, it corresponds to denying the antecedent, which is a formal fallacy which states that,
if p, then q.
not p.
therefore, not q.
for example,
if you are a barber, then you have a job.
you are not a barber.
therefore, you have no job.
it is a fallacy because p is necessary for q, not sufficient, i.e. there can be other reasons that make q true.
mortality salience has two antecedents: the major premise and the minor premise.
i
major premise
the ‘all’ in ‘all organisms are mortal’ is a universal quantifier.
and because organisms are a posteriori, the premise is inductive.
inductive reasoning infers a universal rule–with universal referring to a population–from a set of observations, called a sample.
the major premise starts with observations of organisms dying, for example,
a squirrel died.
my grandma died.
after the sample is representative of the population e.g. it is random or diverse enough, one infers that all organisms die.
there are two ways to deny this premise.
i
denying observations of death
this method hides examples.
examples are burying corpses, moving sick and dying people into hospital wards and nursing homes, and using sanitized language for death e.g. “passed away”, “went to a better place”, “unalive”.
ii
denying induction
this method uses counterexamples.
examples are parents telling their children not to worry about dying from a disease because some people have had it and survived, and making appeals to technological and medical progress to state that current enviromental factors will not affect one as it did people in the past.
ii
minor premise
this premise is also inductive.
i
one observes their bodily functions and products, e.g. blood, saliva, hunger, excretion, sickness, aging, sex etc.
ii
one observes that organisms have the same bodily functions and products as them, i.e. creatureliness, e.g. a dog getting hunger, a crow excreting, an infected plant, pigeons having sex.
iii
with this, one infers that they are an organism as well.
some examples are medical students’ disease, cyberchondria, and secure couples going through the motions of daily life.
there are two ways to deny this premise.
i
denying observations of creatureliness
this method hides examples.
culture e.g. clothing, hygiene, rituals, hides creatureliness when one is a subject.
disgust e.g. being disgusted on looking at drool, stool, is used hides creatureliness when one is an object.
ii
denying one has the same bodily functions and products
this method uses counterexamples.
denying the former corresponds to self-esteem.
for example, accumulating wealth, discovering knowledge, creating art.
denying the latter corresponds to symbolic immortality.
for example, treating one’s body as a container for their soul, treating inputs and outputs to one’s body in terms of positive and negative energy as opposed to e.g. food and excretion.
⠀
overall, this property of death can be called, death categorical syllogismness.
‘The Ride: A Memory’ is a poem about the causes and effects of the desire to flirt with death to feel alive.
A pile of planks, six stories tall
Warped wood absorbing rains and winds
Groaning silently, slouching on itself
Leaning inward in tired defeat
Time has rendered its loss complete
And now its ghostly
As Chernobyl
the speaker is looking at an old, wooden roller coaster.
it is completely abandoned and rotting from weather, and comparing it to chernobyl shows how empty and haunting the place is now.
A stray shoe left on a carousel
Purgatory, for the praxis of quietus
they notice leftover trash, like a lost shoe, which reminds them of the people who used to be here.
“Purgatory, for the praxis of quietus” implies that an amusement park is like a waiting room (purgatory) where people go to practice (praxis) being close to death or silence (quietus).
In the distance, the din of the thrill
A shrill shriek of panic
Shock, at confronting the face of death
Of a straining chain, in the past
A rickety click-clack
A rattletrack cackling as the chain cranks
And hoists the weight of
Twenty souls skyward
they remember the loud noises (din), the screams, and the sound of the metal chain (”rickety click-clack”) pulling 20 riders (”souls”) up to the top of the roller coaster’s first big drop.
Plastic cracking and straining
Broken molds and joists complaining
Sullen joints and tired timbers settling
Tolerances loose
The play
and leeway
adding to the fun
Our ride sounds like it’s breaking on the run
this describes how scary an old wooden coaster feels.
the parts feel loose, as if the ride is literally falling apart while moving, but this danger (”sounds like it’s breaking”) is actually what makes it exciting.
Every twist, a bit more slipped
Away from our path
The intimacy
Of gravity
Pressing hips together at each turn
as the coaster slams through sharp turns, gravity throws the riders against each other, creating a shared moment of closeness (intimacy).
Each shift bleeding a jot more impulse
From a runaway train
Whose passengers seek
A whisper of death
Across their breath
as the train loses speed (impulse) along the track, they realize why people ride it: they want to feel close to danger.
they are seeking a “whisper of death”—a thrill that reminds them they are alive.
Nought to stop your fall
But a lap bar that may catch
A knee, before you tumble free
To strike the ground, on your broken crown
the safety features are very weak, and it adds to the thrill.
At most a harness
Compressed against a chest
Fighting to swallow air
While tempting fate
With wild, banshee screams
Delighting in the scare
As much for the dare
As a possibility of injury
Or a brush with mortality
while the safety harness squeezes the riders’ chest so hard it’s hard to breathe, they still enjoy the experience because while it is probable that they could get hurt or die (”brush with mortality”), it is almost certain that they will get out alive.
Down another fall, so the train won’t stall
To keep the kinetic momentum
From our initial plunge
To tease a little more speed
For a few final thrills
just before stopping, the riders’ might feel that they are safe, so the coaster probably speeds up to violate expectations for one more thrill before stopping.
Before the compressed air hisses
And the clamps tighten
The vice that cements us back in reality
And arrests death, for a time
the end of the ride brings the riders out of their terrifying fantasy and forcefully pulls them “back in reality”, with the brakes i.e. a key safety feature, stopping the danger (”arrests death”).
Then we’re right back where we started
None too soon, a few scares wise
Our invitation to the thrills of simulated demise
Having completed its tour
Wobbly legs planted firmly on the platform
the riders are relieved it’s over (”none too soon”), having gained a few scares.
A barbarian horde, thumping its chest
Defiant, of the end it came to spy
With its own eyes
And having rode to war, ready to decamp
Once more
the relief in the previous stanza contradicts the pride in this one, because this is the point that they feel they were a counterexample to their creatureliness.
an irony here is this counterexample is sort of annulled by the riders acting like barbarians i.e. like creatures.
To the confines of the nearby eatery
For cardboard pizzas and pre-packaged frippery
At the nearby stall
And a novelty, to recall
The epic quest to conquer fear
With laugh and cheer
the creatureliness continues as the riders go eat cheap, terrible (”cardboard”) pizza and buy useless trinkets (”frippery”) at gift shops to remember the day they ‘conquered’ death.
Great hearty gladness, at our triumph
The roar, both defiant and mechanical
Gone now
A shade of the past
the speaker snaps back to the present day, and the grand feeling of triumph, and the loud roaring noise of the coaster, are completely gone now.
this is the point at which the speaker realises that they had never really defeated death back then, but instead, they just thought they did at that point in time.
And the joy that haunts it
Mere memory
Ghosts of your own voice
Calling you back to the past
Where you cheated death
the speaker looks at the ruins, hears their young voice screaming on the ride, and it reminds them of a time in their now-dead youth when they felt brave enough to “cheat death”.





loved “the ride” by PS and was curious to see how you’d analyse the method. so much fun to read. love the colour coding too, considering it an educational aid x